IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/ijlctc/v15yi2p155-163..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of openings ratio and wall thickness on energy performance in educational buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Laila Amer Hashem Alqahtani
  • Lamis Saad Eldeen Elgizawi

Abstract

The building envelope is the boundary between the outer and inner spaces and it is considered as the most significant part in the process of preservation of internal spaces cooling energy consumption. In this context, it is argued that the weakest point in the envelope with the highest transmittance of thermal energy into and out of the internal spaces is the openings (windows and doors) which are affected by many factors such as their ratio, material thermal properties and construction. Therefore, this study sheds light on the alternatives of the envelope design generated with the help of a computer-based simulation tool, Design-Builder, as it has great possibilities for creating simulated scenarios for a specific building or space by linking these scenarios with specific changes in the building parameters. Thus, the study will focus on creating different scenarios for a selected classroom in the College of Arts and Design at Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University (Riyadh, KSA), with the aim of associating the openings ratios (20%, 30%, 50%, 100%) with wall thickness (12 cm, 25 cm solid brick, 25 cm hollow brick) and energy consumption. Optimum alternatives for the opening ratio and construction materials with the lowest cooling loads during working hours are proposed.

Suggested Citation

  • Laila Amer Hashem Alqahtani & Lamis Saad Eldeen Elgizawi, 0. "The effect of openings ratio and wall thickness on energy performance in educational buildings," International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, Oxford University Press, vol. 15(2), pages 155-163.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:15:y::i:2:p:155-163.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/ijlct/ctz064
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:ijlctc:v:15:y::i:2:p:155-163.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.