IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025isupplement_1ps66-s74..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Cognitive Function and Cognitive Decline With Response Time Data in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project

Author

Listed:
  • Seth Sanders
  • Lynne Steuerle Schofield
  • L Philip Schumm
  • Linda Waite

Abstract

ObjectivesScholarly, clinical, and policy interest in cognitive function has grown over the last several decades in part due to large increases in Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias as populations age. However, adequate measures of cognitive function have not been available in many research data sets. We argue that a wealth of previously unexploited survey data exists to model cognition and cognitive decline.MethodsWe use metadata of the time it takes older respondents in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Survey, which we label response times (RTs), to answer questions in a standard cognitive assessment. We compare several measures of RT to a survey-adapted form of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA).ResultsWe show that RTs predict both concurrent and future MoCA scores. Our results show that longer and more varied RT at baseline predict lower MoCA scores 5 years later, net of baseline scores and controls. We also show that the effect of RT measures on predicting current MoCA differs for individuals of different races and ages, but are not different by gender.DiscussionOur paper demonstrates that RTs constitute a separate powerful measure of cognitive functioning. RTs may be remarkably useful both to clinicians and social scientists because they can increase the accuracy of cognitive assessment without increasing the time it takes to administer the assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Seth Sanders & Lynne Steuerle Schofield & L Philip Schumm & Linda Waite, 2025. "Measuring Cognitive Function and Cognitive Decline With Response Time Data in the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(Supplemen), pages 66-74.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:supplement_1:p:s66-s74.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae037
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:supplement_1:p:s66-s74.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.