IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v80y2025isupplement_1ps3-s7..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Cognitive Function In-Person and Remotely in Round 4 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly Pudelek
  • L Philip Schumm
  • Jennifer Hanis-Martin
  • Melissa J K Howe
  • Terese Schwartzman

Abstract

ObjectivesThis paper describes the changes made to the collection of cognitive measures when the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) introduced remote modes of data collection.MethodsIn Round 4 (2021–2023), the longitudinal study transitioned from being conducted in-person to collecting data via multiple modes including in-person and remote modes: web, phone, and paper-and-pencil. The team began with the measures used in Rounds 2 and 3 of NSHAP—the survey-adapted Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-SA)—and evaluated which measures could be administered remotely, introducing new measures for each cognitive subdomain, as needed, to compensate for items that could not be administered remotely.ResultsCognitive items used in Rounds 2 and 3 that could not be administered remotely were dropped from the respective modes, and items selected from the Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center’s (RADC) global cognition battery were added as substitutes. For comparison, the RADC substitute items were added to the in-person mode making it longer in Round 4.DiscussionThe changes in cognitive measures resulted in different numbers of cognitive items across the 4 modes of survey administration in Round 4. Analysts should be aware of these changes when creating a single global cognition score for the entire NSHAP sample in Round 4, and aware that there may be mode effects that could affect cognition scores.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly Pudelek & L Philip Schumm & Jennifer Hanis-Martin & Melissa J K Howe & Terese Schwartzman, 2025. "Measuring Cognitive Function In-Person and Remotely in Round 4 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 80(Supplemen), pages 3-7.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:supplement_1:p:s3-s7.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae149
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:80:y:2025:i:supplement_1:p:s3-s7.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.