IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v79y2024i9p91-116..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intergenerational Educational Mobility and Cognitive Trajectories Among Middle-Aged and Older Chinese People: An Application of Growth Mixture and Mobility Contrast Models in Longitudinal Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Songyun Shi
  • Yu-Chih Chen
  • Alexi Gugushvili
  • Paul S F Yip

Abstract

ObjectivesDue to statistical challenges in disentangling the mobility effect (i.e., intergenerational educational mobility) from the position effect (i.e., parental and person’s own education), the impact of intergenerational educational mobility on cognitive function remains unclear. We employed a novel approach to identify the mobility effect and investigate the net impact of intergenerational educational mobility on heterogeneous patterns of cognition among middle-aged and older adults in China.MethodsParticipants aged 45 and older were recruited from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study, a population-based prospective cohort study between 2011 and 2018. We identified cognitive trajectories using the growth mixture model (GMM) and subsequently employed the mobility contrast model (MCM) to examine the effects of intergenerational educational mobility on cognitive patterns stratified by gender.ResultsAlmost two thirds of respondents experienced intergenerational educational mobility, and 55% experienced upward mobility. Men had a higher rate of upward mobility than women. Three population-based cognitive patterns were identified: the low cognitive function with decline group (28%), the moderate cognitive function group (47%), and the high cognitive function group (26%). MCM analysis revealed that both upward and downward intergenerational educational mobility negatively affected cognitive trajectory patterns, extending beyond the influence of individuals’ current and parental education.DiscussionIn future research, the impact of mobility can be studied in longitudinal data sets by combining the GMM and MCM approaches. The net negative effect of intergenerational educational mobility on cognitive trajectory patterns indicates that it should be recognized as an independent predictor of cognitive decline.

Suggested Citation

  • Songyun Shi & Yu-Chih Chen & Alexi Gugushvili & Paul S F Yip, 2024. "Intergenerational Educational Mobility and Cognitive Trajectories Among Middle-Aged and Older Chinese People: An Application of Growth Mixture and Mobility Contrast Models in Longitudinal Analysis," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(9), pages 91-116.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:9:p:91-116.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae125
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:9:p:91-116.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.