IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v79y2024i8p15-34..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Self-Compassion, Stressor Exposure, and Negative Affect: A Daily Diary Study of Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Julia E T Scott
  • Trevor G Mazzucchelli
  • Mary A Luszcz
  • Ruth Walker
  • Tim D Windsor

Abstract

ObjectivesSelf-compassion has been identified as a psychological resource for aging well. To date, self-compassion among older adults has typically been conceptualized as a trait variable. This study examined whether day-to-day (state) variability in self-compassion was associated with negative affective reactivity to daily stressors.MethodsDaily diary assessment methods were used to examine the potential moderating role of between- and within-person self-compassion on the relationship between daily stressors and negative affect. A community-based sample of 107 older adults aged 65+ completed questionnaires once daily over 14 days.ResultsMultilevel modeling revealed that 37% of the variance in self-compassion occurred within persons. Daily self-compassion moderated the relationship between daily stressor exposure and daily negative affect. On days with greater stressor exposure than usual, older adults showed less negative affective reactivity on days when self-compassion was higher, compared with days when self-compassion was lower. No moderating effects were observed for between-person (trait) self-compassion.DiscussionThese findings suggest that self-compassion in older adults should be conceptualized as both state and trait variables and that state self-compassion may be protective in the stress–reactivity pathway. Future research should investigate whether brief self-compassion interventions might help older adults to avoid or downregulate negative emotions in response to stressors.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia E T Scott & Trevor G Mazzucchelli & Mary A Luszcz & Ruth Walker & Tim D Windsor, 2024. "Self-Compassion, Stressor Exposure, and Negative Affect: A Daily Diary Study of Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(8), pages 15-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:8:p:15-34.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae101
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:8:p:15-34.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.