IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v79y2024i7ps53-s59..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relational Solidarity and Conflicting Ethics in Dementia Care in Urban India

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Brijnath
  • Rachita Rao
  • Upasana Baruah
  • Josefine Antoniades
  • Santosh Loganathan
  • Mathew Varghese
  • Claudia Cooper
  • Mike Kent
  • Briony Dow

Abstract

ObjectivesUsing the concept of relational solidarity, we examine how autonomy, equality, dignity, and personhood are practiced in the care of people living with dementia at home in urban India.MethodsVideo interviews with 19 family carers and 25 health providers conducted in English, Hindi, and Kannada in Bengaluru between March and July 2022. Data were translated into English and thematically analyzed.ResultsFamily carers and providers unanimously agreed that people with dementia should be respected and cared for. Concurrently, they perceived people with dementia as being “like a kid” and used the analogy of a parent–child relationship to understand their care responsibilities. This analogy informed how ethical principles such as personhood and equality were reframed in the relationships between family carers and people with dementia, as well as how carers and providers maintained the safety but undermined the autonomy of people with dementia through restricting their movements inside and outside the home.DiscussionThere can be relational solidarity in dementia care at home in urban India but also contradictions in the interpretations and applications of the ethical principles of autonomy, equality, dignity, and personhood. As such, a more organic, grassroots model of ethical practice is needed to frame care and provide material support to families in India.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Brijnath & Rachita Rao & Upasana Baruah & Josefine Antoniades & Santosh Loganathan & Mathew Varghese & Claudia Cooper & Mike Kent & Briony Dow, 2024. "Relational Solidarity and Conflicting Ethics in Dementia Care in Urban India," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(7), pages 53-59.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:7:p:s53-s59.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:7:p:s53-s59.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.