IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v79y2024i6p74-81..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How False Memory and True Memory Affect Decision Making in Older Adults: A Dissociative Account

Author

Listed:
  • Jianqin Wang
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

ObjectivesRemembering past rewarding experiences plays a crucial rule in guiding people’s decision making in the future. However, as people age, they become less accurate in remembering past events and more susceptible to forming false memories. An important question is how the decline of episodic memory and the increase of false memory may affect older adults’ decision-making performance.MethodsThe current study used a newly developed paradigm in which the Deese–Roediger–McDermott (DRM) false memory paradigm was combined with a reward learning task to create robust false memories of rewarding experiences. Participants learned that some DRM picture lists brought them a monetary reward and some DRM picture lists did not bring reward. Later, their memories were tested and decision-making preferences were measured.ResultsWe found that older and younger adults had almost equivalent false and true memories under the rewarding context, but older adults showed significantly lower decision-making preferences for lure pictures and rewarded pictures than younger adults. Furthermore, true and false memories were a stronger predictor of decision-making preferences for younger than for older adults.DiscussionThese results together suggest an age-related dissociation between memory and decision making that older adults may be less efficient in using their memory to guide decision making than younger adults. Future research may further investigate its underlying mechanisms and develop potential interventions aiming at strengthening the connection between memory and decision making in older adults to help improve their decision-making performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianqin Wang & Angela Gutchess, 2024. "How False Memory and True Memory Affect Decision Making in Older Adults: A Dissociative Account," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(6), pages 74-81.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:6:p:74-81.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae061
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:6:p:74-81.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.