IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v79y2024i5p874-885..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneous Effects of Volunteering on Frailty in Later Life: A Panel Quantile Regression Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Sae Hwang Han
  • Narae Park
  • Jessica A Kelley

Abstract

ObjectivesDecades of research indicate that volunteering is associated with better health for the volunteer beyond the selection effects based on health. However, little is known about potential heterogeneity in health outcomes associated with volunteering in the context of good or poor health. This study addresses this gap by focusing on the frailty index (FI) to investigate the volunteering–health nexus across the population frailty distribution ranging from fit to frail.MethodsUsing nationally representative data from the Health and Retirement Study (person N = 34,986; 198,218 person-wave observations), we estimated unconditional quantile regression models with panel fixed effects to estimate changes in FI associated with changes in the share of volunteers in the population across the frailty distribution observed across the study period (1998–2020).ResultsOur findings demonstrated that the volunteering–FI association was heterogeneous across the frailty distribution. The association was the most potent at the higher end of the frailty distribution, suggesting that efforts to promote volunteering may yield greater benefits for older adults experiencing high levels of frailty.DiscussionThe current study findings provide unique and compelling evidence in support of earlier calls for considering volunteering as a public health intervention. The study findings are discussed in the context of population health outcomes and health disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Sae Hwang Han & Narae Park & Jessica A Kelley, 2024. "Heterogeneous Effects of Volunteering on Frailty in Later Life: A Panel Quantile Regression Approach," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(5), pages 874-885.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:5:p:874-885.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbae033
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:5:p:874-885.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.