IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v79y2024i3p161-169..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in Social Embeddedness Determinants of Loneliness Among Moroccan and Turkish Older Migrants

Author

Listed:
  • Rowan L F ten Kate
  • Tineke Fokkema
  • Theo G van Tilburg
  • Zoya Gubernskaya

Abstract

ObjectivesMoroccan and Turkish migrants residing in Northwestern Europe have high loneliness levels. This study examines gender differences in loneliness within this migrant population. The migrants have gender-segregated social roles at home and in public, which might lead to gender differences in what aspects of social relationships can explain variation in loneliness.MethodsRespondents are from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam with 446 first-generation Moroccan and Turkish migrants in the Netherlands, aged between 55 and 66 years. We use interaction effects to test for gender differences in determinants of loneliness.ResultsMen and women have a similar, moderate level of loneliness. Having a spouse and receiving care from children are more strongly related with lower loneliness levels in men than in women. Coethnic ties play an equally important role for men and women. In men, frequent mosque attendance is related with greater loneliness, but not in women.DiscussionFamily ties are more protective against loneliness for older men than for older women, possibly indicating that migrant women’s expectations regarding family go above and beyond having a spouse, receiving intergenerational care, or having frequent contact with children. In addition, migrant older men’s higher expectations regarding a public social life could make their social life in the Netherlands less fulfilling, resulting in greater loneliness.

Suggested Citation

  • Rowan L F ten Kate & Tineke Fokkema & Theo G van Tilburg & Zoya Gubernskaya, 2024. "Gender Differences in Social Embeddedness Determinants of Loneliness Among Moroccan and Turkish Older Migrants," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 79(3), pages 161-169.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:3:p:161-169.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad177
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:79:y:2024:i:3:p:161-169.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.