IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i8p1435-1443..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Reciprocal Relationship of Self-Rated Health and Instrumental Help From Adult Children: Evidence From Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Jessee

Abstract

ObjectivesReceiving support from adult children may promote or be harmful for older adults’ health. Poor health, however, often precedes the need for intergenerational support. To date, few studies have addressed the relationship between instrumental help (i.e., help with household chores) and older adults’ self-rated health (SRH) simultaneously, thereby accounting for potential reverse causality. Moreover, little research has accounted for omitted variable bias.MethodsDynamic panel models with fixed effects provide an opportunity to address these methodological issues. Drawing on four waves of the German Ageing Survey, which provide a sample of 3,914 parents aged 40–95 years, I investigate the bidirectional linkages between instrumental help from adult children and SRH.ResultsResults suggest that prior receipt of instrumental help is not a significant predictor of future reported SRH. Similarly, previous SRH does not significantly predict the likelihood of receiving instrumental help at follow-up. Instead, earlier values of SRH and instrumental help are most important for predicting future SRH and instrumental help.DiscussionThe results shed new light on the interplay between SRH and instrumental help from adult children. The study suggests that older adults’ health and support in later life are not interdependent. I discuss these findings in relation to future policies for healthy aging to focus on interventions that facilitate optimal health in the earlier stages of the life course and for adult children to provide continued support to their parents.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Jessee, 2023. "The Reciprocal Relationship of Self-Rated Health and Instrumental Help From Adult Children: Evidence From Germany," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(8), pages 1435-1443.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:8:p:1435-1443.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad063
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:8:p:1435-1443.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.