IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i7p1122-1135..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Aging and Economic Preferences: Cumulative Meta-Analyses of Age Differences in Risk, Time, Social, and Effort Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra Bagaïni
  • Yunrui Liu
  • Arzie Bajrami
  • Gayoung Son
  • Loreen Tisdall
  • Rui Mata

Abstract

ObjectivesSeveral theories predict changes in individuals’ economic preferences across the life span. To test these theories and provide a historical overview of this literature, we conducted meta-analyses on age differences in risk, time, social, and effort preferences as assessed by behavioral measures.MethodsWe conducted separate meta-analyses and cumulative meta-analyses on the association between age and risk, time, social, and effort preferences. We also conducted analyses of historical trends in sample sizes and citation patterns for each economic preference.ResultsThe meta-analyses identified overall no significant effects of age for risk (r = −0.02, 95% CI [−0.06, 0.02], n = 39,832) and effort preferences (r = 0.24, 95% CI [−0.05, 0.52], n = 571), but significant effects of age for time (r = −0.04, 95% CI [−0.07, −0.01], n = 115,496) and social preferences (r = 0.11, 95% CI [0.01, 0.21], n = 2,997), suggesting increased patience and altruism with age, respectively. Equivalence tests, which compare these effects to practically important ones (i.e., r = |0.1|), however, suggest that all effects are of trivial significance. The analyses of temporal trends suggest that the magnitude of effects and sample sizes have not changed significantly over time, nor do they dramatically affect the extent that articles are cited.DiscussionOverall, our results contrast with theories of aging that propose general age effects for risk and effort preferences, yet provide some but tenuous support for those suggesting age-related changes in time and social preferences. We discuss implications for theory development as well as future empirical work on economic preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra Bagaïni & Yunrui Liu & Arzie Bajrami & Gayoung Son & Loreen Tisdall & Rui Mata, 2023. "Aging and Economic Preferences: Cumulative Meta-Analyses of Age Differences in Risk, Time, Social, and Effort Preferences," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(7), pages 1122-1135.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:7:p:1122-1135.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad034
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Derek M Isaacowitz, 2023. "Publishing Findings That Speak Against Dominant Theories Is Challenging Yet Important for the Study of Psychological Aging: Introduction to Special Section," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(7), pages 1119-1121.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:7:p:1122-1135.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.