Author
Listed:
- Anne C Krendl
- Willa Mannering
- Michael N Jones
- Kurt Hugenberg
- Daniel P Kennedy
- Phoebe E Bailey
Abstract
ObjectivesTheory of mind—the ability to infer others’ mental states—declines over the life span, potentially due to cognitive decline. However, it is unclear whether deficits emerge because older adults use the same strategies as young adults, albeit less effectively, or use different or no strategies. The current study compared the similarity of older adults’ theory of mind errors to young adults’ and a random model.MethodsOne hundred twenty older adults (MAge = 74.68 years; 64 female) and 111 young adults (MAge = 19.1; 61 female) completed a novel theory of mind task (clips from an episode of the sitcom The Office®), and a standard measure of cognitive function (Logical Memory II). Monte Carlo resampling estimated the likelihood that older adults’ error patterns were more similar to young adults’ or a random distribution.ResultsAge deficits emerged on the theory of mind task. Poorer performance was associated with less similarity to young adults’ response patterns. Overall, older adults’ response patterns were ~2.7 million times more likely to match young adults’ than a random model. Critically, one fourth of older adults’ errors were more similar to the random distribution. Poorer memory ability contributed to this relationship.DiscussionAge deficits in theory of mind performance may be driven by a subset of older adults and be related to disparities in strategy use. A certain amount of cognitive ability may be necessary for older adults to engage similar strategies to young adults’ during theory of mind.
Suggested Citation
Anne C Krendl & Willa Mannering & Michael N Jones & Kurt Hugenberg & Daniel P Kennedy & Phoebe E Bailey, 2023.
"Determining Whether Older Adults Use Similar Strategies to Young Adults in Theory of Mind Tasks,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(6), pages 969-976.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:6:p:969-976.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:6:p:969-976.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.