Author
Listed:
- Erika Kobayashi
- Ken Harada
- Shohei Okamoto
- Jersey Liang
- Jessica Kelley
Abstract
ObjectivesPrevious research has suggested cross-national differences in the association between living alone and well-being among older adults. This study examined whether the association varied across social contexts within the country, Japan, in terms of varying degree of urbanization and differential time periods.MethodsData were obtained from a nine-wave nationwide longitudinal survey with a probability sample of Japanese adults aged 60 years and over. Respondents belonged to one of the three periods (around 1990, 2000, and 2015) according to the year they commenced participation. As many as 4,655 individuals from 575 municipalities provided 9,016 observation sets of two consecutive waves (t − 1 and t). Within a framework of the Hierarchical Generalized Linear Model, depressive symptoms at t were predicted based on changes in living arrangements from t − 1 to t and their cross-level interactions with gender, level of urbanization, and time period, controlling for various covariates at t − 1.ResultsIn general, older adults living alone continuously as well as those who started living alone between the waves showed more depressive symptoms than those coresiding with someone continuously. However, this tendency was more prominent among rural residents than their urban counterparts, especially for men. Moreover, the effect of continuously living alone on depressive symptoms became smaller in Period 2015 than that in Period 1990, because of the increase in depressiveness in coresident older adults.DiscussionOur findings indicate that living alone has a differential effect on older adults’ well-being depending on the social context where residents’ preferences for living arrangements and availability of formal services could vary.
Suggested Citation
Erika Kobayashi & Ken Harada & Shohei Okamoto & Jersey Liang & Jessica Kelley, 2023.
"Living Alone and Depressive Symptoms Among Older Japanese: Do Urbanization and Time Period Matter?,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(4), pages 718-729.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:4:p:718-729.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:4:p:718-729.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.