IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i4p705-717..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Isolation or Replenishment? The Case of Partner Network Exclusivity and Partner Loss in Later Life

Author

Listed:
  • Haosen Sun
  • Markus H Schafer
  • Jessica Kelley

Abstract

ObjectivesPeople’s partners and spouses often provide a wide range of essential emotional and practical support. As crucial as they may be, a nontrivial segment of the older population appears to limit close discussions to their partner alone, a phenomenon we term “partner network exclusivity.” This network structure could leave people vulnerable to partner losses and subsequent social isolation. The present research has 3 aims: (a) examine the prevalence of partner-exclusive networks among European older adults; (b) consider who is most likely to inhabit such networks; and (c) investigate whether and how individuals in such precarious networks rebalance them in case of partner losses.MethodsThe analysis uses Wave 4 (2011) and Wave 6 (2015) of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) to perform logistic regression on one’s possession of partner-exclusive networks and the addition of core ties.ResultsMore than a quarter of partnered respondents (28.1%) are in partner-exclusive core networks. Men, childless individuals, and those with financial difficulties are most likely to occupy such networks. Individuals in partner exclusivity are especially likely to enlist additional ties upon partner loss. Nevertheless, men and individuals at early old age are relatively unlikely to rebalance their core networks in case of partner death.DiscussionThis study provides new evidence that network replenishment following relationship disruptions is plausible even for those from precarious network settings. Nevertheless, widowhood produces patterns of vulnerability for a subset of older adults in partner-exclusive core networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Haosen Sun & Markus H Schafer & Jessica Kelley, 2023. "Isolation or Replenishment? The Case of Partner Network Exclusivity and Partner Loss in Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(4), pages 705-717.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:4:p:705-717.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac190
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shannon T. Mejía & Karen Hooker, 2014. "Relationship Processes Within the Social Convoy: Structure, Function, and Social Goals," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 69(3), pages 376-386.
    2. Yunqing Li, 2007. "Recovering From Spousal Bereavement in Later Life: Does Volunteer Participation Play a Role?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 62(4), pages 257-266.
    3. Kristine J. Ajrouch & Alysia Y. Blandon & Toni C. Antonucci, 2005. "Social Networks Among Men and Women: The Effects of Age and Socioeconomic Status," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 60(6), pages 311-317.
    4. Cornwell, Benjamin & Laumann, Edward O., 2015. "The health benefits of network growth: New evidence from a national survey of older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 94-106.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ella Schwartz & Howard Litwin, 2018. "Social network changes among older Europeans: the role of gender," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 359-367, December.
    2. Thomas Hansen & Marcela Petrová Kafková & Ruth Katz & Ariela Lowenstein & Sigal Naim & George Pavlidis & Feliciano Villar & Kieran Walsh & Marja Aartsen, 2021. "Exclusion from Social Relations in Later Life: Micro- and Macro-Level Patterns and Correlations in a European Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Jin You & Helene Fung & Peter Vitaliano, 2020. "The pattern of social support seeking and its socio-demographic variations among older adults in China," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 341-348, September.
    4. Natalia Arias & María Dolores Calvo & José Alberto Benítez-Andrades & María José Álvarez & Beatriz Alonso-Cortés & Carmen Benavides, 2018. "Socioeconomic Status in Adolescents: A Study of Its Relationship with Overweight and Obesity and Influence on Social Network Configuration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.
    5. Kung, Claryn S. J. & Pudney, Stephen & Shields, Michael A., 2021. "Economic Gradients in Social Health in Britain," IZA Discussion Papers 14731, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Han, Sae Hwang & Kim, Kyungmin & Burr, Jeffrey A., 2018. "Stress-buffering effects of volunteering on salivary cortisol: Results from a daily diary study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 120-126.
    7. Delbosc, Alexa & Mokhtarian, Patricia, 2018. "Face to Facebook: The relationship between social media and social travel," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 20-27.
    8. Isu Cho & Ryan T Daley & Tony J Cunningham & Elizabeth A Kensinger & Angela Gutchess, 2022. "Aging, Empathy, and Prosocial Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(4), pages 57-63.
    9. Kung, Claryn S.J. & Pudney, Stephen E. & Shields, Michael A., 2022. "Economic gradients in loneliness, social isolation and social support: Evidence from the UK Biobank," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    10. Wang, Wei-Pang & Wu, Li-Hsueh & Zhang, Wei & Tsay, Ruey-Ming, 2019. "Culturally-specific productive engagement and self-rated health among Taiwanese older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 79-86.
    11. Danilo Bolano & Bruno Arpino, 2020. "Life after death: Widowhood and volunteering gendered pathways among older adults," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 43(21), pages 581-616.
    12. Miika Mäki & Anna Erika Hägglund & Anna Rotkirch & Sangita Kulathinal & Mikko Myrskylä, 2022. "Stable marital histories predict happiness and health across educational groups," MPIDR Working Papers WP-2022-035, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany.
    13. Amy Chan Hyung Kim & Jungsu Ryu & Chungsup Lee & Kyung Min Kim & Jinmoo Heo, 2021. "Sport Participation and Happiness Among Older Adults: A Mediating Role of Social Capital," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1623-1641, April.
    14. Folashade Alloh & Ann Hemingway & Angela Turner-Wilson, 2019. "Exploring the Experiences of West African Immigrants Living with Type 2 Diabetes in the UK," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Jan-Philip Steinmann & Hannes Kröger & Jörg Hartmann & Theresa M. Entringer, 2024. "Did Religious Well-Being Benefits Converge or Diverge During the Early Stages of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany?," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1-35, October.
    16. Eneja Drobež & David Bogataj, 2022. "Legal Aspects of Social Infrastructure for Housing and Care for the Elderly—The Case of Slovenia," Laws, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-19, February.
    17. Jippes, Erik & Achterkamp, Marjolein C. & Brand, Paul L.P. & Kiewiet, Derk Jan & Pols, Jan & van Engelen, Jo M.L., 2010. "Disseminating educational innovations in health care practice: Training versus social networks," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(10), pages 1509-1517, May.
    18. Megumi Kano & Paul E. Rosenberg & Sean D. Dalton, 2018. "A Global Pilot Study of Age-Friendly City Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 1205-1227, August.
    19. Antonio R. Villa & Elsa Guerrero & Ana M. Villa & Rosalinda Sánchez-Arenas & María Araceli Ortiz-Rodríguez & Vania Contreras-Sánchez & María Alonso-Catalán & Benjamín Guerrero-López & Ingrid Vargas-Hu, 2021. "The Paradoxical Effect of Living Alone on Cognitive Reserve and Mild Cognitive Impairment among Women Aged 60+ in Mexico City," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-12, October.
    20. Nan Feng, 2023. "Social disadvantage, context and network dynamics in later life," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-11, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:4:p:705-717.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.