IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i3p544-555..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic and Contextual Differentials in Memory Decline: A Cross-Country Investigation Between England and China

Author

Listed:
  • Dorina Cadar
  • Laura Brocklebank
  • Li Yan
  • Yaohui Zhao
  • Andrew Steptoe
  • James M Raymo

Abstract

ObjectivesAlthough cognitive functioning is strongly associated with biological changes in the brain during the aging process, very little is known about the role of sociocultural differentials between the western and eastern parts of the world. We examined the associations between individual socioeconomic markers (e.g., education, household wealth) and contextual levels characteristics (e.g., urbanicity) with memory performance and memory decline over up to 8 years of follow-up in England and China.MethodsThe analytical samples included participants aged 50+ from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging (n = 6,687) and the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (n = 10,252). Mixed linear models were employed to examine the association between baseline individual socioeconomic markers (education, wealth) and contextual-level characteristics (urbanicity) on the change in memory over time.ResultsOur analyses showed that higher education and wealth were associated with better baseline memory in both England and China. Still, the impact of contextual-level characteristics such as urbanicity differed between the 2 countries. For English individuals, living in a rural area showed an advantage in memory, while the opposite pattern was observed in China. Memory decline appeared to be socioeconomically patterned by higher education, wealth, and urbanicity in China but not in England.DiscussionOur findings highlight substantial socioeconomic and contextual inequity in memory performance in both England and China, as well as in the rate of memory decline primarily in China. Public health strategies for preventing memory decline should target the socioeconomic gaps at the individual and contextual levels to protect those particularly disadvantaged.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorina Cadar & Laura Brocklebank & Li Yan & Yaohui Zhao & Andrew Steptoe & James M Raymo, 2023. "Socioeconomic and Contextual Differentials in Memory Decline: A Cross-Country Investigation Between England and China," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(3), pages 544-555.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:3:p:544-555.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac163
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Snorri Bjorn Rafnsson & Asri Maharani & Gindo Tampubolon, 2022. "Social Contact Mode and 15-Year Episodic Memory Trajectories in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss: Findings From the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(1), pages 10-17.
    2. Fabian T. Pfeffer & Sheldon Danziger & Robert F. Schoeni, 2013. "Wealth Disparities Before and After the Great Recession," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 650(1), pages 98-123, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schäfer, Dorothea & Stephan, Andreas & Weser, Henriette, 2023. "Crisis stress for the diversity of financial portfolios — evidence from European households," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 330-347.
    2. Tran, My & Gannon, Brenda & Rose, Christiern, 2023. "The effect of housing wealth on older adults’ health care utilization: Evidence from fluctuations in the U.S. housing market," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    3. Filip Chybalski, 2022. "Intergenerational income distribution before and after the great recession: winners and losers," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 49(3), pages 311-327, September.
    4. David M. Cutler & Noémie Sportiche, 2022. "Economic Crises and Mental Health: Effects of the Great Recession on Older Americans," NBER Working Papers 29817, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Edward N. Wolff, 2022. "African‐American and Hispanic Income, Wealth and Homeownership since 1989," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 68(1), pages 189-233, March.
    6. Ian P. McManus, 2024. "Workforce automation risks across race and gender in the United States," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 83(2), pages 463-492, March.
    7. Shiqi Jiang & Lingli Qi & Xinyue Lin, 2022. "The Impacts of COVID-19 Shock on Intergenerational Income Mobility: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Jermaine Toney, 2022. "Is there wealth stability across generations in the U.S.? Evidence from panel study, 1984–2017," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 40(4), pages 551-567, October.
    9. María Alonso-Ferres & Ginés Navarro-Carrillo & Marta Garrido-Macías & Eva Moreno-Bella & Inmaculada Valor-Segura, 2020. "Connecting perceived economic threat and prosocial tendencies: The explanatory role of empathic concern," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(5), pages 1-25, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:3:p:544-555.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.