IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i2p352-358..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship Quality Change Among Partnered Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author

Listed:
  • Jaclyn S Wong
  • Selena Zhong
  • Hui Liu
  • Markus Schafer

Abstract

ObjectivesThe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic dramatically changed social life, but we know less about whether partnered relationships changed during this time. Because high-quality intimate relationships are key to many older Americans’ well-being, we explore whether, how, and for whom the pandemic changed relationship quality among partnered older Americans.MethodsNationally representative data from 1,642 partnered adults aged 50 and older come from the 2020 National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project COVID-19 Study. Multinomial logistic regression analyses estimate the likelihood of reporting improved, unchanged, or worsened relationship quality since the pandemic began across sociodemographic groups.ResultsTwo thirds of respondents reported that relationship quality stayed the same during the pandemic, 22.8% reported their relationship quality got better, and 10.5% reported their relationship quality got worse. Although women and the oldest old were less likely to report improved relationship quality, Black respondents were more likely to do so, even after controlling for explanatory variables.DiscussionResilience describes many partnered older adults’ experiences during the first year of the pandemic, suggesting that they were able to protect their partnerships during this public health crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaclyn S Wong & Selena Zhong & Hui Liu & Markus Schafer, 2023. "Relationship Quality Change Among Partnered Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(2), pages 352-358.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:2:p:352-358.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac140
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Colm O'Muircheartaigh & Stephanie Eckman & Stephen Smith, 2009. "Statistical Design and Estimation for the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(suppl_1), pages 12-19.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Entradas & Martin W Bauer & Colm O'Muircheartaigh & Frank Marcinkowski & Asako Okamura & Giuseppe Pellegrini & John Besley & Luisa Massarani & Pedro Russo & Anthony Dudo & Barbara Saracino & Car, 2020. "Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-17, July.
    2. Shiovitz-Ezra, Sharon & Litwin, Howard, 2012. "Social network type and health-related behaviors: Evidence from an American national survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(5), pages 901-904.
    3. Hawkley, Louise C. & Steptoe, Andrew & Schumm, L. Philip & Wroblewski, Kristen, 2020. "Comparing loneliness in England and the United States, 2014–2016: Differential item functioning and risk factor prevalence and impact," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:2:p:352-358.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.