IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i2p341-351..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Gets Help? A National Longitudinal Study of Personal Networks and Pandemic Support Among Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Molly Copel
  • Hui Liu
  • Markus Schafer

Abstract

ObjectivesPersonal networks provide social support for older adults, perhaps especially during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic when traditional avenues may be disrupted. We provide one of the first population-based studies on how prepandemic personal networks predict support during the pandemic among older adults, with attention to gender and race variation.MethodWe analyzed longitudinal data from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project Round 3 (2015/2016) and COVID-19 Round (2020; N = 2622, 55.68% female, 78.75% White, aged 50–99), a nationally representative survey of community-dwelling older Americans. We considered structure (i.e., size, density) and composition (i.e., proportion female and kin) of prepandemic personal networks, estimating multinomial logistic models to predict self-reported need and receipt of instrumental help and emotional support during the pandemic.ResultsLarger prepandemic confidant networks predicted higher risk of receiving needed pandemic help and support, higher risk of receiving help and support more often than prepandemic, and lower risk of being unable to get help. Denser prepandemic networks also predicted higher risk of receiving pandemic help and support. Furthermore, how network size and density related to support differed with respondent race and a greater proportion of kin in prepandemic networks predicted higher risk of receiving help for non-White older adults only.DiscussionOlder adults’ prepandemic confidant network structure and composition can provide underlying conditions for receiving pandemic social support. Findings speak to policies and programs that aim to foster social support or identify vulnerable groups that suffer the greatest unmet need for support during a global crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Molly Copel & Hui Liu & Markus Schafer, 2023. "Who Gets Help? A National Longitudinal Study of Personal Networks and Pandemic Support Among Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(2), pages 341-351.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:2:p:341-351.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac123
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Child, Stephanie T. & Lawton, Leora E., 2020. "Personal networks and associations with psychological distress among young and older adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bilecen, Başak & Vacca, Raffaele, 2021. "The isolation paradox: A comparative study of social support and health across migrant generations in the U.S," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    2. Michal Isaacson & Ashwin Tripathi & Tannistha Samanta & Lisa D’Ambrosio & Joseph Coughlin, 2020. "Giving Voice to the Environment as the Silent Partner in Aging: Examining the Moderating Roles of Gender and Family Structure in Older Adult Wellbeing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Liyuan Wang & Lindsay E. Young & Lynn C. Miller, 2021. "The Structure of Social Support in Confidant Networks: Implications for Depression," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-16, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:2:p:341-351.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.