IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i1p82-86..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Framing Effects in Older Adults’ Medical Decision-Making: Social Distance Matters

Author

Listed:
  • Yunjiao Chen
  • Jie Xu
  • Cai Xing
  • Anne Krendl

Abstract

ObjectivesThe present study sought to explore how decision making is influenced by aging, framing, and social distance in the medical domain. Based on Socioemotional Selectivity Theory, we predicted that social distance would moderate age differences of framing effects as a result of older adults’ emphasis on close partners.MethodsYounger and middle-aged (N = 206) and older (N = 208) adults from Shanghai, China completed 2 medical decision tasks in which they were presented with different descriptions of social distance, namely deciding for close relatives or for strangers. Participants’ risk preferences were measured.ResultsThe results showed that framing effects were a function of social distance in older adults. Older adults showed smaller framing effects when making decisions for strangers as their preference for the riskier option was reduced in the loss-framed condition. For younger and middle-aged adults, framing effects existed consistently regardless of social distance.DiscussionThese findings suggest that social distance moderates age differences in framing effects in medical decision-making. It also highlights a potential way to improve older adults’ medical decision-making quality: having older adults imagine as if they are making medical decisions for a stranger.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunjiao Chen & Jie Xu & Cai Xing & Anne Krendl, 2023. "Framing Effects in Older Adults’ Medical Decision-Making: Social Distance Matters," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(1), pages 82-86.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:1:p:82-86.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac152
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:1:p:82-86.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.