IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i12p2080-2089..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family Ties and Older Adult Well-Being: Incorporating Social Networks and Proximity

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah E Patterson
  • Rachel Margolis
  • Jessica Kelley

Abstract

ObjectivesThis paper examines the family ties of older adults in the United States and how they are associated with mental health and social activity. We compare older adults with 4 types of family ties: adults “close” to family in proximity and social network, “kinless” older adults without a partner or children, “distanced” adults who live far from close kin, and “disconnected” older adults who do not report kin in their social network or do not report a location for some kin.MethodsUsing pooled data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study 2015–2019 for older adults aged 70 and older (N = 24,818 person-waves), we examine how family ties are associated with mental health and social activity, and whether lacking family is tied to poor well-being because older adults’ needs are not being met.ResultsKinless older adults and disconnected older adults have poorer outcomes (lower mental health scores and less social activity), compared to those close to their family. These findings suggest that both the presence and quality of the connection, as measured here via both location and social network, are critical for understanding which older adults are “at risk.” Older adults who were not geographically proximate to their close kin (i.e., distanced) were not disadvantaged relative to those close to their families. Unmet needs do not help explain these patterns.DiscussionOur results highlight that family ties are important for older adults well-being, not just through their existence but also their quality and strength.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah E Patterson & Rachel Margolis & Jessica Kelley, 2023. "Family Ties and Older Adult Well-Being: Incorporating Social Networks and Proximity," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(12), pages 2080-2089.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:12:p:2080-2089.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad139
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kenzie Latham-Mintus & Deborah Carr, 2019. "A Friend in Need? Exploring the Influence of Disease and Disability Onset on the Number of Close Friends Among Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(8), pages 119-124.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Yulin & Huang, Rui & Grol-Prokopczyk, Hanna & Torres, Jacqueline M., 2022. "Social network change after new-onset pain among middle-aged and older European adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:12:p:2080-2089.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.