IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i11p1870-1878..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Age Matter? Tweets About Gerontocracy in the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Reuben Ng
  • Nicole Indran
  • Markus Schafer

Abstract

ObjectivesDiscussions on the political scene in the United States have been accompanied by the notion that the country has morphed into a gerontocracy, a system of governance where power is wielded predominantly by older individuals. With rising life expectancy, more as well as older candidates are likely to run for and stay in office. This study analyzes perceptions regarding the older political leadership of the United States.MethodsWe collected 3,599 tweets containing the word “gerontocracy” which were uploaded between September 10, 2022 and November 10, 2022, a month prior to the midterm elections in the United States, when this topic was likely to have sparked considerable discussion. After applying our exclusion criteria, 1,266 tweets were retained. Our qualitative content analysis was performed inductively and deductively.ResultsSeven themes emerged. Most tweets (24%; N = 304) highlighted that “Gerontocracy is a Problem” (Theme 1). Theme 2 (21%) focused on how “Democracy is a Sham” (N = 270). Theme 3 (19%) positioned “Old Age as the Problem and Youth as the Solution” (N = 234). Theme 4 (11%) was about how “The Future is at Stake” (N = 145). “Health Concerns” dominated Theme 5 (10%; N = 126). Theme 6 looked at “Structural Reforms” (9%, N = 115). Theme 7 “In Defense of the Gerontocracy” formed 6% of the data set (N = 72).DiscussionAttitudes toward older politicians are commonly tied to negative stereotypes surrounding old age. As the population ages, it is paramount that society focuses on potentially more important considerations in the evaluation of the actual caliber of a politician.

Suggested Citation

  • Reuben Ng & Nicole Indran & Markus Schafer, 2023. "Does Age Matter? Tweets About Gerontocracy in the United States," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(11), pages 1870-1878.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:11:p:1870-1878.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad113
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:11:p:1870-1878.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.