IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v78y2023i10p1747-1755..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Turning It Over to God: African American Assisted Living Residents’ End-of-Life Preferences and Advance Care Planning

Author

Listed:
  • Candace L Kemp
  • Antonius D Skipper
  • Alexis A Bender
  • Molly M Perkins
  • Kate de Medeiros

Abstract

ObjectivesAssisted living (AL), a popular long-term care setting for older Americans, increasingly is a site for end-of-life care. Although most residents prefer AL to be their final home, relatively little is known about end-of-life preferences and advance care planning, especially among African American residents. Our research addresses this knowledge gap.MethodsInformed by grounded theory, we present an analysis of qualitative data collected over 2 years in a 100-bed AL community catering to African American residents. Data consisted of field notes from participant observation conducted during 310 site visits and 818 observation hours, in-depth interviews with 25 residents, and a review of their AL records.ResultsResidents varied in their end-of-life preferences and advance care planning, but united in the belief that God was in control. We identified “Turning it over to God” as an explanatory framework for understanding how this group negotiated end-of-life preferences and advance care planning. Individual-level resident factors (e.g., age, pain, and function) and factors reflecting broader cultural and societal influences, including health literacy and care experiences, were influential.DiscussionContradictions arose from turning it over to God, including those between care preferences, planning, and anticipated or actual end-of-life outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Candace L Kemp & Antonius D Skipper & Alexis A Bender & Molly M Perkins & Kate de Medeiros, 2023. "Turning It Over to God: African American Assisted Living Residents’ End-of-Life Preferences and Advance Care Planning," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(10), pages 1747-1755.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:10:p:1747-1755.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbad100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:78:y:2023:i:10:p:1747-1755.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.