IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i9p1637-1644..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Subjective Aging and Objectively Assessed Hearing Function: A Prospective Study of Older Adults
[A systematic review and meta-analysis of subjective age and the association with cognition, subjective wellbeing, and depression]

Author

Listed:
  • Yannick Stephan
  • Angelina R Sutin
  • Antonio Terracciano

Abstract

ObjectivesSubjective aging is consistently related to a range of health-related outcomes, but little is known about its relationship with sensory functioning. The present prospective study tested whether subjective age and self-perceptions of aging (SPA) are associated with objective hearing function.MethodsParticipants were 7,085 individuals aged 50–93 years (60% women, mean = 65.15, standard deviation [SD] = 8.71) from the Health and Retirement Study. Measures of subjective age, SPA, and information on demographic factors were obtained in 2008/2010. Objective hearing function was assessed 8 years later in 2016/2018. Furthermore, potential mediating variables (C-reactive protein, body mass index, physical inactivity, and chronic conditions) were assessed in 2012/2014.ResultsIn regression analyses that accounted for demographic factors, older subjective age and negative SPA were associated with lower hearing acuity 8 years later. In addition, 1 SD older subjective age and negative SPA were related to a 9% and 7% higher likelihood of hearing impairment. Mediation analyses revealed that physical inactivity and chronic conditions partially mediated subjective age and SPA associations with hearing acuity. There was little evidence that the link between subjective aging and hearing was moderated by hearing aids and partial support for a moderating role of age.DiscussionThis study provides new evidence that subjective aging is prospectively related to hearing function. Individuals with older subjective age or negative SPA have unfavorable behavioral and clinical profiles that explain part of their lower hearing function. Individuals’ experience with their aging process is a marker of risk for impaired hearing.

Suggested Citation

  • Yannick Stephan & Angelina R Sutin & Antonio Terracciano, 2022. "Subjective Aging and Objectively Assessed Hearing Function: A Prospective Study of Older Adults [A systematic review and meta-analysis of subjective age and the association with cognition, subjecti," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(9), pages 1637-1644.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:9:p:1637-1644.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellen Melbye Langballe & Vegard Skirbekk & Bjørn Heine Strand, 2023. "Subjective age and the association with intrinsic capacity, functional ability, and health among older adults in Norway," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:9:p:1637-1644.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.