IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i8p1550-1560..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compensatory Connections? Living Alone, Loneliness, and the Buffering Role of Social Connection Among Older American and European Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Markus H Schafer
  • Haosen Sun
  • Jin A Lee

Abstract

ObjectivesThe growth of solo living has important implications for the rising “loneliness epidemic” among older adults. This study considered whether 2 forms of social connectedness—extra-household core discussion networks and social participation—buffer the loneliness associated with living alone.MethodOur study used data from 2 surveys (National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project; Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe) encompassing 20 developed Western countries in 2009/2010 and 2015/2016 (n = 110,817). Harmonizing measures across data sets, we estimated survey-specific and pooled longitudinal regression models with interaction terms.ResultsHigh levels of social connectedness only moderately buffered the loneliness associated with living alone in later life. Findings were largely consistent across regions of Europe and the United States, though the buffering patterns were most robustly identified for widowed solo dwellers.DiscussionExtra-household connections are partial compensators, but do not seem to fully replace the ready companionship afforded by residential copresence in later life. Future research is needed to understand whether the efficacy of compensatory connections differs by gender, race/ethnicity, and across more diverse global regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus H Schafer & Haosen Sun & Jin A Lee, 2022. "Compensatory Connections? Living Alone, Loneliness, and the Buffering Role of Social Connection Among Older American and European Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(8), pages 1550-1560.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:8:p:1550-1560.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab217
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:8:p:1550-1560.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.