IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i8p1454-1463..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Does Aging Affect Social Attention? A Test of Competing Theories Using Multilevel Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Kate T McKay
  • Louisa A Talipski
  • Sarah A Grainger
  • Manikya Alister
  • Julie D Henry

Abstract

ObjectivesThe present study provides a meta-analytic assessment of how gaze-cued attention—a core social-cognitive process—is influenced by normal adult aging.MethodsA multilevel meta-analysis of standardized mean changes was conducted on gaze-cueing effects. Age effects were quantified as standardized mean differences in gaze-cueing effect sizes between young and older adult samples.ResultsWe identified 82 gaze-cueing effects (k = 26, N = 919 participants). Of these, 37 were associated with young adults (k = 12, n = 438) and 45 with older adults (k = 14, n = 481). Relative to younger adults, older adults had a reduced gaze-cueing effect overall, g = −0.59, with this age effect greater when the cues were predictive, g = −3.24, rather than nonpredictive, g = −0.78.DiscussionThese results provide the clearest evidence to date that adult aging is associated with a reduction in gaze-cued attention. The results also speak to potential mechanisms of this age effect. In line with cognitive decline models of aging, it was demonstrated that when gaze cues were predictive, only younger adults seem to benefit, suggesting that older adults exhibit a particularly reduced capacity to use gaze cues volitionally.

Suggested Citation

  • Kate T McKay & Louisa A Talipski & Sarah A Grainger & Manikya Alister & Julie D Henry, 2022. "How Does Aging Affect Social Attention? A Test of Competing Theories Using Multilevel Meta-Analysis," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(8), pages 1454-1463.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:8:p:1454-1463.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac052
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:8:p:1454-1463.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.