IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i7pe179-e184..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotional, Social, and Existential Loneliness Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prevalence and Risk Factors Among Dutch Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Theo G van Tilburg
  • Jessica Kelley

Abstract

ObjectivesThe coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, with its accompanying isolation measures, has led to increasing loneliness among older adults. In this study, we examine whether the increased level of loneliness observed in the Netherlands persisted into the fall of 2020, whether there were differences in emotional, social, and existential loneliness, and whether the presence of well-known risk factors for loneliness also led to further increases in loneliness during the pandemic.MethodsData were obtained from the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam, with observations of 404 community-dwelling older adults aged 74–96 years from 2019 and fall 2020.ResultsLoneliness increased between 2019 and 2020, and the increase was particularly high for emotional loneliness (partial η 2 = 0.19). Having a partner and a high mastery and good physical functioning before the pandemic provided some protection against an increase in loneliness.DiscussionLoneliness increased for almost all older people. Targeted policies can reduce the negative impact of vulnerabilities. Efforts to combat loneliness during the pandemic should focus not only on groups traditionally considered vulnerable, such as socially isolated people, but also on older adults with a partner and who have daily contact with others.

Suggested Citation

  • Theo G van Tilburg & Jessica Kelley, 2022. "Emotional, Social, and Existential Loneliness Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Prevalence and Risk Factors Among Dutch Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(7), pages 179-184.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:7:p:e179-e184.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab101
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lydia W Li & Rita Xiaochen Hu & Meng Sha Luo & Sara J McLaughlin & Jessica Kelley, 2023. "Prepandemic Social Integration: Protection or Risk for Older Adults in the Time of COVID-19?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 78(2), pages 330-340.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:7:p:e179-e184.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.