IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i7p1263-1268..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Brief Report on Older Working Caregivers: Developing a Typology of Work Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Dawn C Carr
  • Kendra Jason
  • Miles Taylor
  • Tiffany R Washington

Abstract

ObjectivesA growing proportion of the U.S. labor force juggles paid work with family caregiving of older adults. However, no research has examined caregivers’ work environments. The purpose of this brief report is to develop typologies of the work environments of family caregivers.MethodsThis study used data drawn from the 2008–2012 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. Our sample includes employed individuals who also provided regular help with daily activities to a parent or spouse (n = 976). We used latent class analysis to develop caregiver work environment typologies.ResultsOur analyses revealed 4 typologies among caregivers: (a) high-quality work environments (n = 340; 35%); (b) average work environments with high job lock (n = 293; 30%); (c) low-quality work environments (n = 203; 21%); and (d) high personal interference in supportive work environments (n = 140; 14%). Although only 21% of working caregivers were in a low-quality work environment (Type C), descriptive results suggest that these workers were most likely to be minorities who needed to work for financial reasons, reporting the highest number of health problems, and the most work hours.DiscussionOur findings provide insights into the types of environments that caregivers work in, and the characteristics of individuals in those environments. We discuss implications of our findings for future research and work-based policy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawn C Carr & Kendra Jason & Miles Taylor & Tiffany R Washington, 2022. "A Brief Report on Older Working Caregivers: Developing a Typology of Work Environments," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(7), pages 1263-1268.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:7:p:1263-1268.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab131
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:7:p:1263-1268.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.