IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i6p1164-1176..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Parental Death and Cognitive Impairment: An Examination by Gender and Race–Ethnicity

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Liu
  • Zhiyong Lin
  • Debra Umberson

Abstract

ObjectivesWe provide the first nationally representative longitudinal study of cognitive impairment in relation to parental death from childhood through early adulthood, midlife, and later adulthood, with attention to heterogeneity in the experience of parental death.MethodsWe analyzed data from the Health and Retirement Study (2000–2016). The sample included 13,392 respondents, contributing 72,860 person-periods. Cognitive impairment was assessed using the modified version of the Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. Discrete-time hazard regression models were estimated to predict the odds of cognitive impairment.ResultsBoth exposure and timing of parental death were related to the risk of cognitive impairment in late life and associations vary by gender. The detrimental effect of a father’s death was comparable for daughters and sons although exposure to a mother’s death had stronger effects on daughter’s than son’s risk of cognitive impairment. Father’s death at younger ages had the strongest effect on sons’ late-life risk of cognitive impairment, whereas mother’s death in middle adulthood had the strongest effect on daughters’ risk. We found no significant racial–ethnic variation in the association between parental death and cognitive impairment.DiscussionIt is important to explore the gender-specific pathways through which parental death leads to increased risk of cognitive impairment so that effective interventions can be implemented to reduce risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Liu & Zhiyong Lin & Debra Umberson, 2022. "Parental Death and Cognitive Impairment: An Examination by Gender and Race–Ethnicity," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(6), pages 1164-1176.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:6:p:1164-1176.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab125
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:6:p:1164-1176.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.