IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i5p919-929..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Isolation Profiles and Older Adult Substance Use: A Latent Profile Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Antoinette Y Farmer
  • Yuqi Wang
  • N Andrew Peterson
  • Suzanne Borys
  • Donald K Hallcom

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to determine substance use among older adults based upon their social isolation and loneliness profiles.MethodsData were derived from the New Jersey Older Adult Survey on Drug Use and Health. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was used to determine the profiles of older adults (N = 801) based on 5 dimensions of social isolation and loneliness. Logistic and generalized ordered logistic regressions were conducted to assess the relationship between the latent profiles and substance use.ResultsLPA identified 5 social isolation/loneliness profiles. The “connected and active” group had the lowest odds of cigarette use. The “alone but not lonely” group had the highest odds of cigarette use, alcohol use, and high-risk drinking. The “alone and lonely” group had the highest odds of nonmedical drug use.DiscussionIn working with older adults who are using substances, it is important to inquire about their social isolation and loneliness. Cognitive behavioral therapy for the “alone and lonely” group may be beneficial, as it has been deemed effective in reducing loneliness and enhancing social networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoinette Y Farmer & Yuqi Wang & N Andrew Peterson & Suzanne Borys & Donald K Hallcom, 2022. "Social Isolation Profiles and Older Adult Substance Use: A Latent Profile Analysis," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(5), pages 919-929.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:5:p:919-929.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab078
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:5:p:919-929.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.