IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i5p895-904..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High- and Low-Arousal Daily Affect Dynamics Vary Across the Adult Lifespan

Author

Listed:
  • Hio Wa Mak
  • Stefan Schneider

Abstract

ObjectivesAge differences in affective experience across adulthood are widely documented. According to the circumplex model of affect consists of 2 aspects—valence (positive vs negative) and arousal (low activation vs high activation). Prior research on age differences has primarily focused on the valence aspect. However, little is known about age differences in daily affect of high and low arousal.MethodThe present study examined age differences in daily dynamics (i.e., mean levels, variability, and inertia) of negative affect (NA) and positive affect (PA) of high and low arousal in a sample of 492 adults aged 21–91. Participants completed daily affect ratings for 21 consecutive days.ResultsAge was negatively and linearly related to mean levels of both high-arousal and low-arousal NA. Both high-arousal and low-arousal PA mean levels showed increases after middle age. Further, age was related to lower variability in both NA and PA regardless of arousal. Additionally, high-arousal NA inertia showed a linear decrease with age, whereas low-arousal PA inertia showed an inverted-U pattern with age. After controlling for mean levels of affect, the associations between age and affect variability remained significant, whereas the associations between age and affect inertia did not.DiscussionThe affective profile of older age is characterized by lower mean levels of NA, higher mean levels of PA, lower affect variability, and less persistence in high-arousal NA and low-arousal PA in daily life. Our results contribute to a nuanced understanding of which affective processes improve with age and which do not.

Suggested Citation

  • Hio Wa Mak & Stefan Schneider, 2022. "High- and Low-Arousal Daily Affect Dynamics Vary Across the Adult Lifespan," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(5), pages 895-904.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:5:p:895-904.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab203
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:5:p:895-904.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.