IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i2p312-320..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contrasting Internet Adoption in Early and Advanced Old Age: Does Internet Self-Efficacy Matter?
[The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift]

Author

Listed:
  • Mario R Jokisch
  • Louisa Scheling
  • Michael Doh
  • Hans-Werner Wahl

Abstract

ObjectivesUnderstanding why older adults (including those in very old age) use or do not use the Internet can build on the technology acceptance model (TAM). In this cross-sectional study, we translate the TAM to the Internet and assume that perceived usefulness of the Internet (PUI) and perceived ease of use of the Internet (PEUI) will be revealed as major predictors of behavioral intention to use the Internet (BII). Additionally, we consider the role of Internet self-efficacy (ISE) as another major factor for older adults’ Internet use. We also argue that life phase, particularly early as opposed to advanced old age, may moderate how PUI, PEUI, and ISE relate to BII.MethodsA sample of 1,200 older adults aged 60 years and older (60–74 years, n = 658; 75–99 years, n = 542) was randomly drawn from the city of Stuttgart, Germany. Sociodemographic variables and major indicators of TAM and ISE were assessed based on a computer-assisted telephone interviewing procedure.ResultsLatent structural equation modeling revealed that PUI is the more important predictor of BII in older adults. Furthermore, ISE revealed statistically meaningful positive links with PUI, PEUI, and BII. Multigroup comparison revealed that PUI had a stronger linkage with BII in early old age, whereas ISE was more important for BII in advanced old age.DiscussionThe results suggest that ISE may enrich the network of TAM constructs among older adults in general but specifically in advanced old age.

Suggested Citation

  • Mario R Jokisch & Louisa Scheling & Michael Doh & Hans-Werner Wahl, 2022. "Contrasting Internet Adoption in Early and Advanced Old Age: Does Internet Self-Efficacy Matter? [The legacy of the technology acceptance model and a proposal for a paradigm shift]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(2), pages 312-320.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:2:p:312-320.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab096
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:2:p:312-320.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.