IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i12pe216-e225..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Associations Between Use of Paid Help and Care Experiences Among Medicare–Medicaid Enrolled Older Adults With and Without Dementia
[Addressing social determinants of health and health disparities: A vital direction for health and health care]

Author

Listed:
  • Chanee D Fabius
  • Safiyyah M Okoye
  • John Mulcahy
  • Julia G Burgdorf
  • Jennifer L Wolff
  • Jessica Kelley

Abstract

ObjectivesCommunity-living older Medicare and Medicaid enrollees (“dual-enrollees”) have high care needs and commonly receive paid and unpaid long-term services and supports (LTSS) to help with routine activities. Little is known about whether receiving paid help or individuals’ state and neighborhood environmental context (“LTSS environment”) relates to dual-enrollees’ care experiences.MethodsWe examine a sample of n = 979 community-dwelling dual-enrollees with disabilities from 2011 to 2015 National Health and Aging Trends Study, linked to measures of neighborhood disadvantage and state Medicaid home and community-based services (HCBS) generosity. Logistic regression models stratified by dementia status assess associations between paid help and: (a) adverse consequences due to unmet care needs, and (b) participation restrictions in valued activities, among dual-enrollees with and without dementia, adjusting for individual and LTSS environmental characteristics.ResultsUse of paid help was greater for those with (versus without) dementia (46.9% vs. 37.8%). Neighborhood disadvantage was associated with greater use of paid help among dual-enrollees living with dementia. High state Medicaid HCBS generosity was associated with the use of paid help, regardless of dementia status. Dual-enrollees with dementia receiving paid help had higher odds of experiencing adverse consequences due to unmet need (adjusted odds ratio = 2.05; 95% confidence interval 1.16–3.61; p = .02)―no significant associations were observed for participation restrictions. Use of paid help and LTSS environment were not significantly associated with care experiences for dual-enrollees without dementia.DiscussionFindings highlight the complexities of caring for dual-enrollees, particularly those with dementia, and emphasize the need to strengthen the delivery of paid care with considerations for the LTSS environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Chanee D Fabius & Safiyyah M Okoye & John Mulcahy & Julia G Burgdorf & Jennifer L Wolff & Jessica Kelley, 2022. "Associations Between Use of Paid Help and Care Experiences Among Medicare–Medicaid Enrolled Older Adults With and Without Dementia [Addressing social determinants of health and health disparities: ," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(12), pages 216-225.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:12:p:e216-e225.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac072
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:12:p:e216-e225.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.