IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i12p2212-2222..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biases in Retrospective Perceptions of Changes in Well-Being Associated With Aging Attitudes
[Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline]

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas M Hess
  • Jeongsoo Park
  • Helene H Fung
  • Klaus Rothermund
  • Anne Krendl

Abstract

ObjectivesAging attitudes have important consequences on functioning in later life. A critical question concerns whether such attitudes may bias perceptions of one’s own aging, with potentially negative effects on important outcomes.MethodsUsing data from adults aged 30–85 years in Germany (n = 623), Hong Kong (n = 317), and the United States (n = 313), we examined the impact of age and aging attitudes on accuracy of perceptions of change in well-being over 5 years in different domains of functioning.ResultsAcross contexts, comparisons revealed good correspondence between retrospective reports and actual change. However, older adults and those with negative attitudes retrospectively reported less positive change over this period. Inconsistent with expectations, attitudes did not consistently bias accuracy of retrospective reports over cultures and domains of functioning, nor did age have a consistent moderating effect on the impact of attitudes on accuracy.DiscussionThe results highlight the complex relationship between various personal characteristics and perceptions of change in well-being, as well as the potentially insidious effects of attitudes on the accuracy of these perceptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas M Hess & Jeongsoo Park & Helene H Fung & Klaus Rothermund & Anne Krendl, 2022. "Biases in Retrospective Perceptions of Changes in Well-Being Associated With Aging Attitudes [Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decl," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(12), pages 2212-2222.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:12:p:2212-2222.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:12:p:2212-2222.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.