IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i10p1916-1927..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Marital Loss and Cognitive Function: Does Timing Matter?
[Life transitions and daily stress processes]

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenmei Zhang
  • Hui Liu
  • Yan Zhang

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study examines the association between age at marital loss (i.e., divorce or widowhood) and cognitive function in later life and whether the association differs by gender.MethodsWe used mixed-effects models, drawing on longitudinal data from the Health and Retirement Study (1998–2016). The analytical samples included adults aged 51 and older who had ever been widowed (N = 5,639 with 25,537 person-waves) or divorced (N = 10,685 with 50,689 person-waves).ResultsWe find that those who were widowed at younger ages had lower cognitive function than their counterparts who were widowed at older ages, for both men and women, after controlling for covariates. Household income and health-related factors partially accounted for the positive association between age at widowhood and cognitive function. Those who divorced at younger ages also had lower cognitive function than their counterparts who divorced at older ages, but this association was only present among men, not women. Health-related factors partially accounted for the association between age at divorce and cognitive function among men.DiscussionFindings highlight the importance of considering the role of timing of marital loss in cognitive health among older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenmei Zhang & Hui Liu & Yan Zhang, 2022. "Marital Loss and Cognitive Function: Does Timing Matter? [Life transitions and daily stress processes]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(10), pages 1916-1927.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:10:p:1916-1927.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac069
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:10:p:1916-1927.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.