IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v77y2022i10p1820-1830..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age and Framing Effects in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task
[On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny—Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory]

Author

Listed:
  • Adam T Schulman
  • Amy W Chong
  • Corinna E Löckenhoff

Abstract

ObjectivesPrior research has documented age differences in risky decisions and indicates that they are susceptible to gain versus loss framing. However, previous studies focused on “decisions from description” that explicitly spell out the probabilities involved. The present study expands this literature by examining the effects of framing on age differences in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART), a widely used and ecologically valid measure of experience-based risky decision making that involves pumping a virtual balloon.MethodsIn a preregistered study, younger (aged 18–30, n = 129) and older adults (aged 60 and older, n = 125) were randomly assigned to either a gain version of the BART, where pumping the balloon added monetary gains, or a loss version, where pumping the balloon avoided monetary losses.ResultsWe found a significant age by frame interaction on risk-taking: in the loss frame, older adults pumped more frequently and experienced more popped balloons than younger adults, whereas in the gain frame no significant age differences were found. Total performance on the BART did not vary by age or frame. Supplementary analyses indicated that age differences in pumping rates were most pronounced at the beginning of the BART and leveled off in subsequent trials. Controlling for age differences in motivation, personality, and cognition did not account for age differences in risk-taking.DiscussionIn combination, findings suggest that age differences in risk-taking on the BART are more pronounced when the task context emphasizes avoiding losses rather than achieving gains.

Suggested Citation

  • Adam T Schulman & Amy W Chong & Corinna E Löckenhoff, 2022. "Age and Framing Effects in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task [On the incomplete architecture of human ontogeny—Selection, optimization, and compensation as foundation of developmental theory]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 77(10), pages 1820-1830.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:10:p:1820-1830.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbac060
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:77:y:2022:i:10:p:1820-1830.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.