IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021isupplement_3ps287-s298..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elder Mistreatment Methods and Measures in Round 3 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project

Author

Listed:
  • Jaclyn S Wong
  • Melissa J K Howe
  • Hannah Breslau
  • Kristen E Wroblewski
  • V Eloesa McSorley
  • Linda J Waite
  • Robert Wallace

Abstract

ObjectivesElder mistreatment has negative consequences for older adults’ health and well-being. As such, scholars aim to understand its causes, the contexts in which it occurs, how to prevent victimization, and how to design interventions for mistreated older adults. This paper provides a detailed overview of the 2015–2016 National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) Round 3 Elder Mistreatment Module (EMM) to encourage further research on the topic.MethodThis paper reviews previous elder mistreatment scholarship, describes the EMM, provides descriptive analyses of elder mistreatment among community-dwelling older adults, and discusses promising approaches and limitations to future research with these data.ResultsThe EMM includes 10 stem questions to measure elder mistreatment behaviors experienced since age 60 and 2 follow-up questions about perceived severity and the identity of the perpetrator. The stem questions can be analyzed individually or combined into a scale, and researchers can account for severity as a robustness check. Analysts can also group the measures into specific types of elder mistreatment. A major strength of the EMM is its ability to identify perpetrators in victims’ core social networks.DiscussionThe NSHAP Round 3 EMM provides scholars an opportunity to study older Americans’ mistreatment experiences, particularly as they relate to their physical and mental health, their social networks and personal relationships, and their broader social contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaclyn S Wong & Melissa J K Howe & Hannah Breslau & Kristen E Wroblewski & V Eloesa McSorley & Linda J Waite & Robert Wallace, 2021. "Elder Mistreatment Methods and Measures in Round 3 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(Supplemen), pages 287-298.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:supplement_3:p:s287-s298.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab106
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fadzilah Hanum Mohd Mydin & Christopher Mikton & Wan Yuen Choo & Ranita Hisham Shunmugam & Aja Murray & Yongjie Yon & Raudah M. Yunus & Noran N. Hairi & Farizah M. Hairi & Marie Beaulieu & Amanda Phel, 2024. "Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(3), September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:supplement_3:p:s287-s298.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.