IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021isupplement_3ps266-s275..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracking Egocentric Social Network Change Across Three Rounds of National Survey Data

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin Cornwell
  • L Philip Schumm
  • Edward O Laumann
  • Alyssa W Goldman
  • Ellen L Compernolle
  • Merril Silverstein

Abstract

BackgroundThe National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project (NSHAP) has collected 3 rounds of data on older adults’ egocentric social networks. We describe the structure of network data collection for different components of the sample and the data that are available for those groups. We also describe survey techniques that were used to track specific personnel changes that occurred within respondents’ networks during the 10-year study period.MethodDescriptive statistics are presented for measures of network size, composition, and internal structure at all 3 rounds, respondent-level summary measures of change in these characteristics between and across rounds, and measures of change associated with the loss and addition of network members across Rounds 1, 2, and 3. Procedures that were used to clean the network change data are also explained.ResultsThe NSHAP network change module provides reliable information about specific changes that occurred within respondents’ confidant networks. For returning baseline respondents, there is considerable overlap with respect to which confidants are named in successive rosters, but the norm is for Round 3 networks to be composed primarily of new confidants.DiscussionThese data provide new insights into the dynamic nature of networks in later life. Data limitations, and directions for future research, are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin Cornwell & L Philip Schumm & Edward O Laumann & Alyssa W Goldman & Ellen L Compernolle & Merril Silverstein, 2021. "Tracking Egocentric Social Network Change Across Three Rounds of National Survey Data," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(Supplemen), pages 266-275.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:supplement_3:p:s266-s275.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab100
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:supplement_3:p:s266-s275.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.