IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i8p1664-1672..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Limiting and Promoting Resident Self-Care in Assisted Living

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer C Morgan
  • Candace L Kemp
  • Christina Barmon
  • Andrea Fitzroy
  • Mary M Ball
  • Deborah S Carr

Abstract

ObjectivesAssisted living (AL) residents often manage multiple chronic conditions, functional and/or cognitive decline along with their individual needs and preferences for a full life. Although residents participate in their own care, little is known about their self-care activities and how to support them. This analysis focuses on residents’ self-care and theorizing the dynamic, socially embedded process of negotiating self-care.MethodsWe analyze data from a grounded theory study informed by the Convoys of Care model. Participants included 50 focal residents and 169 paid and unpaid convoy members in eight AL homes; each resident convoy was followed up for 2 years. Data collection included participant observation, interviews, and resident record review.ResultsTo the extent possible, most AL residents were involved in self-care related to activities of daily living, health promotion, and social, emotional, and mental well-being. Residents and care partners engaged in a dynamic process of limiting and promoting self-care activities. Multiple factors influenced self-care, including residents’ past self-care behaviors, caregiver fear and availability, and the availability of services and supports.DiscussionStrategies for promoting self-care must involve residents and care partners and include convoy education in collaborative goal-setting, prioritizing care that supports the goals, and putting resources in place to support goal achievement.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer C Morgan & Candace L Kemp & Christina Barmon & Andrea Fitzroy & Mary M Ball & Deborah S Carr, 2021. "Limiting and Promoting Resident Self-Care in Assisted Living," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(8), pages 1664-1672.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:8:p:1664-1672.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:8:p:1664-1672.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.