IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i7p1349-1359..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Health and Subjective Views on Aging: Longitudinal Findings From the ActiFE Ulm Study

Author

Listed:
  • Anton Schönstein
  • Dhayana Dallmeier
  • Michael Denkinger
  • Dietrich Rothenbacher
  • Jochen Klenk
  • Anke Bahrmann
  • Hans-Werner Wahl
  • Shevaun Neupert

Abstract

ObjectivesPrevious research supports that subjective views on aging (VoA), such as older subjective age (SA) and negative attitudes toward own aging (ATOA), go along with negative outcomes. A differentiated treatment of health and disease as antecedents of VoA is largely lacking. Therefore, our objective was to estimate the relationship between generally framed physical, affective, and cognitive health as well as specific diseases and VoA, operationalized both as SA and ATOA.MethodsData were drawn from the ActiFE Ulm study for which a representative sample of community-dwelling older people (65–90 years) was recruited at baseline. Follow-ups were conducted 7.7 years (median) after recruitment (N = 526). Health- and disease-related data at baseline, based on established assessment procedures for epidemiological studies, were regressed on VoA (1-item SA indicator, 5-item ATOA scale) measures at follow-up.ResultsReported severity of affective health problems such as depression was the strongest general risk factor for both older SA and negative ATOA. Also, some but not all major diseases considered were associated with VoA. Notably, back pain predicted negative ATOA, while cancer was associated with older SA. Rheumatism was linked with more negative ATOA along with higher SA. Throughout analyses, explained variance in ATOA was considerably higher than in SA.DiscussionAffective health problems, such as depression, should be regarded as a major correlate of subjective aging views. Interestingly, diseases do not have to be life-threatening to be associated with older SA or negative ATOA.

Suggested Citation

  • Anton Schönstein & Dhayana Dallmeier & Michael Denkinger & Dietrich Rothenbacher & Jochen Klenk & Anke Bahrmann & Hans-Werner Wahl & Shevaun Neupert, 2021. "Health and Subjective Views on Aging: Longitudinal Findings From the ActiFE Ulm Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(7), pages 1349-1359.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:7:p:1349-1359.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbab023
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ellen Melbye Langballe & Vegard Skirbekk & Bjørn Heine Strand, 2023. "Subjective age and the association with intrinsic capacity, functional ability, and health among older adults in Norway," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-10, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:7:p:1349-1359.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.