Author
Listed:
- Yijung K Kim
- Kyungmin Kim
- Kathrin Boerner
- Gyounghae Han
- Lynn Martire
Abstract
ObjectivesHow intergenerational relationships influence individuals’ views on aging remains understudied. This study investigated how multiple older family members’ health and financial challenges may shape middle-aged adults’ aging anxiety.MethodMarried Korean baby boomers (N = 1,389) from the Korean Baby Boomer Panel Study reported on their own aging anxiety and rated each of their living parents’ and in-laws’ health and financial conditions. Using structural equation modeling, we examined how parents’ and in-laws’ health and financial challenges are associated with one’s aging anxiety, and whether gender and frequency of intergenerational contact moderate the link. We expected worse health or financial conditions to be associated with higher levels of aging anxiety, and the effect to be more pronounced for women and those with more contact.ResultsA worse financial condition of the poorest parent/in-law was associated with higher levels of aging anxiety, while worse health condition of the unhealthiest parent/in-law was associated with lower levels of aging anxiety. The same results were found when we considered the sum of all living parents’ and in-laws’ financial and health conditions. Frequency of contact moderated the effect of the financial condition of the poorest parent/in-law, such that individuals reporting more contact with the poorest parent/in-law showed higher levels of aging anxiety than those with less contact. There was no moderating effect of gender.DiscussionThe findings highlight the role family ties play in shaping one’s aging anxiety. Interventions aimed at improving views on aging through intergenerational interactions should target the quality of the intergenerational experience.
Suggested Citation
Yijung K Kim & Kyungmin Kim & Kathrin Boerner & Gyounghae Han & Lynn Martire, 2021.
"Like Parent, Like Child? Aging Anxiety Among Married Korean Baby Boomers,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(7), pages 1292-1301.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:7:p:1292-1301.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:7:p:1292-1301.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.