Author
Listed:
- Xiaoling Xiang
- Yong Yang
- Jianjia Cheng
- Ruopeng An
- Deborah Carr
Abstract
ObjectivesThis study examines the impact of a previously validated disability spectrum that accounts for compensatory strategies on depressive symptoms in older adults.MethodsThis study was a secondary data analysis of 2011 through 2018 surveys from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (N = 7,609). The disability spectrum was categorized using a 5-level hierarchical scheme: fully able, successful accommodation, reduced activity, difficulty, and assistance for 12 mobility, self-care, and household activities. The individual fixed-effects panel model was used to examine the impact of this disability spectrum on depressive symptoms.ResultsDepressive symptoms rose progressively with each successive category on the disability spectrum in descriptive analyses. In fixed-effects models, moving from “fully able” to “successful accommodation” was not associated with significant changes in depressive symptoms; this result held for all self-care and mobility activities. Moving from “fully able” to “reduced activity” was associated with a significant increase in depressive symptoms for 3 household activities (doing laundry, making hot meals, and shopping for groceries) but not for paying bills/banking or keeping track of medications. Going up 2 or more stages above “fully able” on the disability spectrum was associated with a significant increase in depressive symptoms across all 12 activities.DiscussionWhile limitations in a range of daily activities have harmful effects on mental health, using compensatory strategies that do not erode one’s perception of autonomy can help older adults cope with the psychological detriments of late-life disability.
Suggested Citation
Xiaoling Xiang & Yong Yang & Jianjia Cheng & Ruopeng An & Deborah Carr, 2021.
"The Impact of Late-Life Disability Spectrum on Depressive Symptoms: A Fixed-Effects Analysis of Panel Data,"
The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(4), pages 810-819.
Handle:
RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:810-819.
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:810-819.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.