IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i4p722-731..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Distinguishing the Impact of Age on Semantic and Nonsemantic Associations in Episodic Memory

Author

Listed:
  • Gabriel Jarjat
  • Geoff WardDPhil
  • Pascal Hot
  • Sophie Portrat
  • Vanessa M Loaiza
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

ObjectivesRefreshing, or the act of briefly foregrounding recently presented but now perceptually absent representations, has been identified as a possible source of age differences in working memory and episodic memory. We investigated whether the refreshing deficit contributes to the well-known age-related deficit for retrieving nonsemantic associations, but has no impact on existing semantic associations.MethodYounger and older adults judged the relatedness of stimulus word pairs (e.g., pink–blue or pink–cop) after repeating or refreshing one of the words. During a later source recognition memory test, participants determined whether each item recognized as old was presented on the left or right (nonsemantic source memory) and presented in a related or unrelated pair (semantic source memory). The data were analyzed using a hierarchical Bayesian implementation of a multinomial model of multidimensional source memory.ResultsNeither age group exhibited a refreshing benefit to nonsemantic or semantic source memory parameters. There was a large age difference in nonsemantic source memory, but no age difference in semantic source memory.DiscussionThe study suggests that the nature of the association is most important to episodic memory performance in older age, irrespective of refreshing, such that source memory is unimpaired for semantically meaningful information.

Suggested Citation

  • Gabriel Jarjat & Geoff WardDPhil & Pascal Hot & Sophie Portrat & Vanessa M Loaiza & Angela Gutchess, 2021. "Distinguishing the Impact of Age on Semantic and Nonsemantic Associations in Episodic Memory," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(4), pages 722-731.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:722-731.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaa010
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:722-731.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.