IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i4p703-710..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Following Instructions in Working Memory: Do Older Adults Show the Enactment Advantage?

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel O Coats
  • Amanda H Waterman
  • Fiona Ryder
  • Amy L Atkinson
  • Richard J Allen
  • Angela Gutchess

Abstract

ObjectivesIn young adults, the ability to verbally recall instructions in working memory is enhanced if the sequences are physically enacted by the participant (self-enactment) or the experimenter (demonstration) during encoding. Here we examine the effects of self-enactment and demonstration at encoding on working memory performance in older and younger adults.MethodFifty young (18–23 years) and 40 older (60–89 years) adults listened to sequences of novel action-object pairs before verbally recalling them in the correct order. There were three different encoding conditions: spoken only, spoken + demonstration, and spoken + self-enactment. We included two different levels of difficulty to investigate whether task complexity moderated the effect of encoding condition and whether this differed between age groups.ResultsRelative to the spoken only condition, demonstration significantly improved young and older adults’ serial recall performance, but self-enactment only enhanced performance in the young adults, and this boost was smaller than the one gained through demonstration.DiscussionOur findings suggest that additional spatial-motoric information is beneficial for older adults when the actions are demonstrated to them, but not when the individual must enact the instructions themselves.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel O Coats & Amanda H Waterman & Fiona Ryder & Amy L Atkinson & Richard J Allen & Angela Gutchess, 2021. "Following Instructions in Working Memory: Do Older Adults Show the Enactment Advantage?," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(4), pages 703-710.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:703-710.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaa214
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:4:p:703-710.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.