IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i3p507-517..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Socioeconomic Status Moderates Age Differences in Empathic Concern
[The influence of a sense of time on human development]

Author

Listed:
  • Tianyuan Li
  • Pok-Man Siu
  • Shevaun Neupert

Abstract

ObjectivesOlder age has been found to relate to a higher level of empathic concern and prosocial tendencies in many studies, but there are also studies that found contradictory results. To fully understand the phenomenon, we propose that socioeconomic status (SES) is an important factor to consider when examining differences in empathic concern and prosocial tendencies.MethodTwo studies with Hong Kong Chinese participants were conducted to test the moderating effect of SES on the relationship between age and empathic concern. Both studies assessed participants’ age, SES, empathic concern, and background information, while Study 2 also examined different indicators of prosocial tendencies.ResultsSES consistently moderated age differences in empathic concern in the two studies. The positive association between age and empathic concern was only significant for individuals with low SES, but not for those with high SES. Study 2 further revealed that the positive indirect effects from age to prosocial tendencies through a higher level of empathic concern were only significant for individuals with low SES as well.DiscussionThe results highlighted the importance to consider contextual factors when studying age-related differences.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianyuan Li & Pok-Man Siu & Shevaun Neupert, 2021. "Socioeconomic Status Moderates Age Differences in Empathic Concern [The influence of a sense of time on human development]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(3), pages 507-517.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:3:p:507-517.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:3:p:507-517.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.