IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i2p229-241..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Coordinated Multi-study Analysis of the Longitudinal Association Between Handgrip Strength and Cognitive Function in Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea R Zammit
  • Andrea M Piccinin
  • Emily C Duggan
  • Andriy Koval
  • Sean Clouston
  • Annie Robitaille
  • Cassandra L Brown
  • Philipp Handschuh
  • Chenkai Wu
  • Valérie Jarry
  • Deborah Finkel
  • Raquel B Graham
  • Graciela Muniz-Terrera
  • Marcus Praetorius BjörkD
  • David Bennett
  • Dorly J Deeg
  • Boo Johansson
  • Mindy J Katz
  • Jeffrey Kaye
  • Richard B Lipton
  • Mike Martin
  • Nancy L Pederson
  • Avron Spiro
  • Daniel Zimprich
  • Scott M Hofer
  • Nicole Anderson

Abstract

ObjectiveHandgrip strength, an indicator of overall muscle strength, has been found to be associated with slower rate of cognitive decline and decreased risk for cognitive impairment and dementia. However, evaluating the replicability of associations between aging-related changes in physical and cognitive functioning is challenging due to differences in study designs and analytical models. A multiple-study coordinated analysis approach was used to generate new longitudinal results based on comparable construct-level measurements and identical statistical models and to facilitate replication and research synthesis.MethodsWe performed coordinated analysis on 9 cohort studies affiliated with the Integrative Analysis of Longitudinal Studies of Aging and Dementia (IALSA) research network. Bivariate linear mixed models were used to examine associations among individual differences in baseline level, rate of change, and occasion-specific variation across grip strength and indicators of cognitive function, including mental status, processing speed, attention and working memory, perceptual reasoning, verbal ability, and learning and memory. Results were summarized using meta-analysis.ResultsAfter adjustment for covariates, we found an overall moderate association between change in grip strength and change in each cognitive domain for both males and females: Average correlation coefficient was 0.55 (95% CI = 0.44–0.56). We also found a high level of heterogeneity in this association across studies.DiscussionMeta-analytic results from nine longitudinal studies showed consistently positive associations between linear rates of change in grip strength and changes in cognitive functioning. Future work will benefit from the examination of individual patterns of change to understand the heterogeneity in rates of aging and health-related changes across physical and cognitive biomarkers.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea R Zammit & Andrea M Piccinin & Emily C Duggan & Andriy Koval & Sean Clouston & Annie Robitaille & Cassandra L Brown & Philipp Handschuh & Chenkai Wu & Valérie Jarry & Deborah Finkel & Raquel B , 2021. "A Coordinated Multi-study Analysis of the Longitudinal Association Between Handgrip Strength and Cognitive Function in Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(2), pages 229-241.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:2:p:229-241.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz072
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sean A. P. Clouston & Graciela Muniz Terrera & Joseph Lee Rodgers & Patrick O'Keefe & Frank D. Mann & Nathan A. Lewis & Linda Wänström & Jeffrey Kaye & Scott M. Hofer, 2021. "Cohort and Period Effects as Explanations for Declining Dementia Trends and Cognitive Aging," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 47(3), pages 611-637, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:2:p:229-241.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.