IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v76y2021i1p184-194..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Transpersonal Genetic Effects Among Older U.S. Couples: A Longitudinal Study
[Convoys of social relations: Past, present, and future]

Author

Listed:
  • Aniruddha Das
  • Deborah Carr

Abstract

BackgroundEmerging social genetics research suggests one’s genes may influence not just one’s own outcomes but also those of close social alters. Health implications, particularly in late life, remain underexplored. Using combined genetic and survey data, this study examined such transpersonal genetic associations among older U.S. couples.MethodData were from married or cohabiting couples in the 2006–2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study, nationally representative of U.S. adults over 50. Measures included a polygenic score for educational attainment, and self-rated health. Analysis was through parallel process latent growth models.ResultsWomen’s and men’s genetic scores for education had transpersonal linkages with their partner’s health. Such associations were solely with life-course variations and not late-life change in outcomes. Moreover, they were indirect, mediated by educational attainment itself. Evidence also emerged for individual-level genetic effects mediated by the partner’s education.DiscussionIn addition to the subject-specific linkages emphasized in extant genetics literature, relational contexts involve multiple transpersonal genetic associations. These appear to have consequences for a partner’s and one’s own health. Life-course theory indicates that a person is never not embedded in such contexts, suggesting that these patterns may be widespread. Research is needed on their implications for the life-course and gene–environment correlation literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Aniruddha Das & Deborah Carr, 2021. "Transpersonal Genetic Effects Among Older U.S. Couples: A Longitudinal Study [Convoys of social relations: Past, present, and future]," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(1), pages 184-194.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:1:p:184-194.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz151
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linda Waite & Aniruddha Das, 2010. "Families, social life, and well-being at older ages," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 47(1), pages 87-109, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hui Liu & Shannon Shen & Ning Hsieh, 2019. "A National Dyadic Study of Oral Sex, Relationship Quality, and Well-Being among Older Couples," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 74(2), pages 298-308.
    2. Zhe Ji & Elsie Yan, 2022. "Psycho-Social Factors Associated with Intimacy Needs in Divorced and Widowed Older Chinese Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Jo Mhairi Hale, 2017. "Cognitive Disparities: The Impact of the Great Depression and Cumulative Inequality on Later-Life Cognitive Function," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(6), pages 2125-2158, December.
    4. Das, Aniruddha, 2021. "The relational genomics of cognitive function: A longitudinal study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    5. Das, Aniruddha, 2019. "Genes, depressive symptoms, and chronic stressors: A nationally representative longitudinal study in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    6. Das, Aniruddha, 2022. "Religious attendance and global cognitive function: A fixed-effects cross-lagged panel modeling study of older U.S. adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:76:y:2021:i:1:p:184-194.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.