IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i9p2050-2061..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges in Caring for Unbefriended Residents in Long-term Care Homes: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Stephanie A Chamberlain
  • Wendy Duggleby
  • Pamela B Teaster
  • Janet Fast
  • Carole A Estabrooks
  • Candace Kemp

Abstract

ObjectivesThis study examined challenges experienced by long-term care staff in caring for unbefriended residents who are incapacitated and alone. These residents often are estranged from or have no living family or live geographically distant from them and require a public guardian as their surrogate decision-maker. To date, research on unbefriended older adults has focused on those living in acute care and community settings. Little is known about those living in long-term care homes.MethodWe conducted semi-structured interviews with 39 long-term care staff (e.g., registered nurses, care aides, social workers) and 3 public guardians. Staff were sampled from seven long-term care homes in Alberta, Canada. We analyzed interview transcripts using content analysis and then using the theoretical framework of complex adaptive systems.ResultsLong-term care staff experience challenges unique to unbefriended residents. Guardians’ responsibilities did not fulfill unbefriended residents’ needs, such as shopping for personal items or accompanying residents to appointments. Consequently, the guardians rely on long-term care staff, particularly care aides, to provide increased levels of care and support. These additional responsibilities, and organizational messages dissuading staff from providing preferential care, diminish quality of work life for staff.DiscussionLong-term care homes are complex adaptive systems. Within these systems, we found organizational barriers for long-term care staff providing care to unbefriended residents. These barriers may be modifiable and could improve the quality of care for unbefriended residents and quality of life of staff. Implications for practice include adjusting public guardian scope of work, improving team communication, and compensating staff for additional care.

Suggested Citation

  • Stephanie A Chamberlain & Wendy Duggleby & Pamela B Teaster & Janet Fast & Carole A Estabrooks & Candace Kemp, 2020. "Challenges in Caring for Unbefriended Residents in Long-term Care Homes: A Qualitative Study," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(9), pages 2050-2061.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:9:p:2050-2061.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbaa079
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Catherine Cook & Mark Henrickson & Vanessa Schouten, 2022. "Palliative Care, Intimacy, and Sexual Expression in the Older Adult Residential Care Context: “Living until You Don’t”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-18, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:9:p:2050-2061.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.