IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i7pe141-e150..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spousal Education and Cognitive Functioning in Later Life

Author

Listed:
  • Minle XuPhD
  • Shevaun NeupertPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesNumerous studies have documented the relationship between education and cognitive functioning at the individual level. Yet few studies have examined whether a spouse’s education spills over to influence the other spouse’s cognitive functioning. This study, therefore, investigates the association between spousal education and cognitive functioning, the pathways that may account for this association, and gender differences in this association.MethodGrowth curve models were analyzed by using longitudinal couple data from the Health and Retirement Study (N = 5,846 individuals).ResultsMore years of spousal education are associated with higher level of cognitive functioning at age 65 (γ000 = 0.0532, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.0163−0.0901) and slower decline in cognitive functioning in later adulthood (γ100 = 0.0054, 95% CI = 0.0026−0.0082). The positive association between spousal education and the level of cognitive functioning at age 65 is fully explained by economic resources. The association of spousal education with the rate of change in cognitive functioning decreases but remains significant after controlling for economic resources and health behaviors (γ100 = 0.0043, 95% CI = 0.0014−0.0072). The association between spousal education and cognitive functioning is similar for men and women.DiscussionFindings suggest that more years of spousal education may slow decline in cognitive functioning for men and women in later life.

Suggested Citation

  • Minle XuPhD & Shevaun NeupertPhD, 2020. "Spousal Education and Cognitive Functioning in Later Life," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(7), pages 141-150.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:e141-e150.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz014
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:e141-e150.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.