IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i7p1585-1596..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solitary Day, Solitary Activities, and Associations With Well-Being Among Older Adults

Author

Listed:
  • Jack LamPhD
  • Joan García-RománPhD
  • Deborah CarrPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesDrawing on activity theory of aging, we examined whether solitary activities may be associated with negative well-being, as they may reflect social isolation. Using American Time Use Surveys, with information on “with whom” individuals engaged in activities over a 24 hr period, we created measures capturing solitary days and solitary activities to understand their prevalence and associations with well-being.MethodsAt the daily level, we examined associations between solitary days and proportion of the day in solitary activities with life satisfaction. At the activity level, we examined associations between engaging in an activity alone versus with others and emotional state during the activity.ResultsSolitary days and higher proportion of the day spent in solitary activities were associated with lower life satisfaction. These associations were attenuated controlling for individual covariates. Engagement in activities alone was associated with lower levels of happiness and higher levels of sadness and pain during the activity, and association with happiness remained even adjusting for covariates.DiscussionA sizable proportion of older adults reported solitary days, and proportion of the day spent in solitary activities increases by age. Examining lived experiences of older adults and presence of others during activities could contribute to research on social isolation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack LamPhD & Joan García-RománPhD & Deborah CarrPhD, 2020. "Solitary Day, Solitary Activities, and Associations With Well-Being Among Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(7), pages 1585-1596.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1585-1596.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz036
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1585-1596.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.