IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i7p1573-1584..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Network Characteristics and Their Associations With Stress in Older Adults: Closure and Balance in a Population-Based Sample

Author

Listed:
  • Lea EllwardtPhD
  • Rafael P M WittekPhD
  • Louise C HawkleyPhD
  • John T CacioppoPhD
  • Deborah CarrPhD

Abstract

ObjectivesIntegration into social networks reduces stress during adverse life events and improves coping with disability in late life. The aim was to investigate whether social network closure (frequent contact among ties) and balance (positive contact among ties) are associated with perceived stress. We expect lowest stress for older adults with highly closed and balanced networks.MethodPanel data on self-reported egocentric networks stem from the population-based Chicago Health, Aging, and Social Relations Study. Five waves were collected between 2002 and 2006, with 708 observations from 160 participants aged 50–68 years at baseline. Data include information on the participants’ social relationships, that is, interaction frequency and relationship quality, for ego–alter ties and alter–alter ties, and participants’ perceived stress. The analytical strategy used fixed- and random-effects models.ResultsParticipants reporting the highest number of balanced relationships (positive ties among alters) experience least stress. This effect holds independently of sociodemographic confounders, loneliness, and network size.DiscussionThe absence of a stress-reducing effect from network closure suggests that balance matters more. Future research would benefit from considering balance when examining the characteristics of social networks that impinge on mental health outcomes in older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Lea EllwardtPhD & Rafael P M WittekPhD & Louise C HawkleyPhD & John T CacioppoPhD & Deborah CarrPhD, 2020. "Social Network Characteristics and Their Associations With Stress in Older Adults: Closure and Balance in a Population-Based Sample," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(7), pages 1573-1584.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1573-1584.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz035
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Latikka, Rita & Koivula, Aki & Oksa, Reetta & Savela, Nina & Oksanen, Atte, 2022. "Loneliness and psychological distress before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Relationships with social media identity bubbles," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    2. Qu, Tianyao, 2024. "A bridge too far? Social network structure as a determinant of depression in later life," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1573-1584.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.