IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/geronb/v75y2020i7p1558-1562..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mastery and Longevity in Spousal Caregivers of Persons with Dementia

Author

Listed:
  • Jyoti SavlaPhD
  • Zhe WangPhD
  • Jiafeng ZhuMS
  • Nancy BrossoiePhD
  • Karen A RobertoPhD
  • Rosemary BliesznerPhD
  • Deborah CarrPhD

Abstract

ObjectiveResearchers have consistently shown that providing care in a gradually deteriorating situation, such as dementia, can be stressful and detrimental to the caregiver’s (CG) health. Although stressor appraisal is important in understanding variability in CG outcomes, the role of personal mastery, a coping resource, in shaping CG’s health outcomes has not been considered. The primary goal of this paper was to determine whether personal mastery is associated with a survival advantage for spousal CGs of persons with dementia.MethodsThis study assessed the association of CG burden and personal mastery with longevity over a 10-year period in 71 spousal CGs of persons initially diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment.ResultsOver the 10 years, 16 of 71 CGs (23%) died. Cox regression models with right censoring of CGs’ time to death showed that after adjusting for the health of family CG, spousal CGs who reported high levels of burden had an 83% reduced risk of death when they also reported high personal mastery (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.04, 0.65).ConclusionsFindings have implications for support programs that help build personal mastery.

Suggested Citation

  • Jyoti SavlaPhD & Zhe WangPhD & Jiafeng ZhuMS & Nancy BrossoiePhD & Karen A RobertoPhD & Rosemary BliesznerPhD & Deborah CarrPhD, 2020. "Mastery and Longevity in Spousal Caregivers of Persons with Dementia," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 75(7), pages 1558-1562.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1558-1562.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/geronb/gbz028
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:geronb:v:75:y:2020:i:7:p:1558-1562.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/psychsocgerontology .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.